Saturday, 20 October 2007

The fall and fall of Respect

I've been trying to follow, via Harry's Place, the floundering of the different strands of the SWP coalition. Here is the latest instalment. The contents are not funny, and I derive no pleasure from it whatsoever. No, really.

Take this, for example:

"George Galloway responded by saying "it's too late." He said that Paul's long speech was to soften the blow of his last few words - that Tower Hamlets will elect its delegates tonight. He said that 57% of the list were members of the SWP, which is not a balanced list. He likened Ayesha and Paul to a series of Russian dolls. They are members of a group that meets in secret, deciding on a democratic centralist line. Kevin, Rob and Nick Wrack were expelled from the SWP as they did not agree to the Russian doll. He said that the SWP cannot control Respect through Russian doll means. He said that right at the start of Respect everyone was happy. But various mistakes have been made which expose this Russian doll. He said that he believes that Paul and Ayesha do believe what they are saying, but that they would have said it even if they didn't believe it.


Maggie Falshaw raised a point of order asking George Galloway for the proof of this comment.


George Galloway replied "this is a waste of time, move to the vote." He said that this is not a genuine discussion, we know what each other are about, the arguments have been decided elsewhere. He said that we won't be ruled by people somewhere else who take decisions elsewhere and bring those decisions here. This is not a Leninist organisation. He said that this meeting has the power to elect the delegates."

It all ends by Gorgeous telling the SWP-ers to fuck off.

At least if Respect does fracture into different components, leftists can finally ignore them and find bigger fish to fry.

Cory

Posted by The golden strawberry at 17:52:44 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Gordon Brown's election problems, and other stories

I was asked to write a satirical column for Redbrick news. Did I succeed?:

No Harman-y

 

All this talk about Gordon Brown’s election problems is very boring. He may have had a bad Prime Minister’s Questions, but that doesn’t really matter. Nobody watches PMQs anyway. Or knows what his “Vision for Britain” is. Only that it consists of Gordon Brown being in power for at least another eighteen months or so.

 

Instead, let’s talk about Harriet Harman. You have probably forgotten who she is already – she won the Labour Deputy Leadership contest earlier this year. Which surprised me. As a Labour party member I voted in the election, and Harriet’s campaign seemed to be the worst. Worse even than Hazel Blears, and the sight of Hazel Blears on television usually makes me want to gouge my eyes out with rusty spoons. Harman’s campaign seemed to rest on two main planks. The first was essentially “Vote for me because I am a woman”. The second was to say that Labour ought to apologise for the Iraq war. She then denied saying this after she became deputy leader.

 
Therefore Harman comes across as a loose cannon, who is prepared to say just about anything to anyone in order to please them. In her campaign she claimed she had always “campaigned for equality and social justice.” In fact, when Harman was Social Secretary in 1997 she cut the benefit rate for unemployed single parents (something she had spoken out against in Opposition).
 
On last week’s Question Time, Harman again confirmed her “loose cannon” status. Asked whether Gordon Brown should have called an election (zzzz…) Harman said she thought that Parliament, not the Prime Minister, should decide when to call an election. Like many of Harman’s ideas, this seems well-meaning but crap. Parliament already has the means to do this, through a vote of no confidence motion. Having fixed-term Parliaments is, however, a separate and better idea.
 

Furthermore, she doesn’t seem to have talked to anyone before unveiling this idea. Gordon Brown has said nothing about it. On the Labour website there is nothing. Other senior Labour figures have said, you guessed it, nothing. Perhaps we should just put Harriet Harman and Ed Balls in a cupboard or something, and let them out after Labour wins the next election. They will cause less damage there.

 

End of the Ming dynasty

 

Liberal Democrat MPs make unlikely assassins, but they have now stabbed two leaders in the back within nineteen months. I feel sorry for Ming Campbell, whose only fault was not his ability or his views, but his age. Now their caretaker leader is Vince Cable, a man who looks like Ming, but with less hair and bushier eyebrows. Potential leaders have until October 31st to throw their name into the hat.

 

For the moment, however, there is the usual claptrap that is spouted after a leader goes. Lib Dem MPs are continually praising Ming. Party president Simon Hughes, for instance, said that he had brought “purpose and stability” to the party. But if Ming was so good, why was his job “under discussion” - as the aforementioned Mr Cable said the day before Ming resigned? David Laws, Lib Dem spokesman for something or other, appeared on Channel 4 news to praise Ming. When asked who he thought should be the next leader, he replied that it was inappropriate to speculate at this moment in time. If you cannot speculate on who should be your new party leader when there is a vacancy, then when can you speculate?

 

Well, I am going to speculate now. The frontrunners are Nick Clegg and Chris Huhne. Nick Clegg is a trendy, David Cameron-type. But if you were going to vote for a David Cameron type, wouldn’t you just vote for David Cameron? Chris Huhne, by contrast, is boring. The Lib Dems need a vote winner, someone who the voters recognise. Which is why the new leader should either be Charles Kennedy or Lembit Opik.

 

By getting rid of Charles Kennedy, the Lib Dems lost their only electoral asset. Bringing him back would be embarrassing, but necessary. If that proves to be too embarrassing, then the Lib Dems should embrace Mr Cheeky Girl as their new leader. He at least is recognised by most of the general public, and this counts for more than policy in British politics today. As Alistair Darling as shown, if you don’t have a policy of your own, just nick the Opposition’s. With Labour and the Tories increasingly similar, there is a need for the Lib Dems to be distinctive. And how much more distinctive can you get than Lembit Opik?

 

And finally…

 

Laughing at the Lib Dems is harmless enough, but laughing at Tories is much more fun. They were left £8million in the will of Branislav Kostic. Sadly, he had been suffering from serious mental health problems, and was convinced only the Conservatives could protect humanity from evil spirits. This week a judge forced them to return the money to his family, and ruled that Mr Kostic would not have given to the Conservative Party “if he were of sane mind”. Well, who would?

Cory

Posted by The golden strawberry at 16:26:34 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Patrick Eston interview

My interview with the leader of Veritas, Patrick Eston:

There are not many leaders of political parties who would just be standing, with no entourage whatsoever, outside Joe's in the Guild. That, however, is how I found Patrick Eston, leader of Veritas, before his interview. No spin doctors or media consultants for him.


Some of you may recall that Veritas was the party led by Robert Kilroy-Silk when it launched in 2004. Eston was involved with the launch from the start, and elected leader in September 2005. Although he is not a fulltime politician, he instead runs six local businesses, including one that makes conservatories.


After a quiet 2007, Veritas has used this summer to secure funding (Patrick assures me that he is not selling peerages to fund Veritas) and relocate their main offices to Tamworth. His appearance at a University of Birmingham debate is part of a new campaign to raise Veritas' profile.


So why should we vote for Veritas? "Our country has been taken from us by people it shouldn’t have been, such as the PC Brigade and the European Union. We want a return to old-fashioned common sense values".


As a wet leftist, I have little sympathy for Patrick's point of view. But he is a very genial and personable, so political differences don't seem to matter. His conversation is very natural, in contrast with the overrehearsed theatrics of people like David Cameron, who try too hard to pretend to be a normal person. It is difficult to imagine Gordon Brown describing something as "bullsh*t", or Menzies Campbell announcing that they "need to get the bloody thing sorted out", as Patrick does. Not exactly statesman-like, but it is obviously resonating with a section of the electorate. From a standing start Veritas has gained a membership of thousands in just three years, which is not bad going.


So where does Patrick see Veritas in ten years’ time? Again he responds with an honesty that one does not expect from a politician: "either we will no longer be around, or we will have an MEP or two. These things take time, and obviously a week is a long time in politics. But we have just started 'Young Veritas' so the future is looking positive ". Can you imagine another politician wondering whether his party will be around in a decade?


We talk about Gordon Brown’s recent decision not to call a General Election. Should he have? "Yes. He [Brown] has no mandate to rule. He would have called an election if he had been certain of winning it, but instead he has bottled it. It is an insult to the electorate, and in my opinion he will pay the price. This has undermined his authority ".


At the debate, Patrick proposed the motion: "this House believes that the UK should leave the EU". Yet, apparently, Veritas wants to keep "cordial relations with its neighbours" after it leaves. Is this practically possible? "I think so. The analogy I would use to describe this is 'an amicable divorce'. The model we would want to base our relations with Europe on is that of countries like Norway and Switzerland. They are able to trade with Europe, while not having to abide by all of the EU's rules and regulations. Switzerland recently did a cost-benefit analysis which calculated that they would be ninetimes better off if they stayed out of the EU."


Climate change is another issue Veritas takes a slightly contentious view on. There is an article on the Veritas website entitled "The great climate change swindle", which declares that "Environmentalism is a sort of substitute religion with a highly paid priesthood, even at town hall level", with thousands of jobs depending on "maintaining an atmosphere of doom, gloom and hysteria…on the hypothesis that climate change is largely driven by human activity ". Does Patrick endorse views like this? "The jury's out. There is global warming, and carbon dioxide levels may play a part, but that may not be the only factor. The climate moves in cycles. After all, in the fifteenth century they were making wine in London because of the hot weather there. What I do object to is using climate change as an excuse to raise taxes on cars, which then doesn 't go on improving roads."


Whether or not you agree with Patrick Eston or Veritas, you have to admire his drive for this latest venture. Setting up a new party is a thankless task, and we can do nothing but wish him the very best of luck!


Cory
Posted by The golden strawberry at 16:16:07 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Monday, 15 October 2007

Oh dear

Kerron Cross has national security on his mind, obviously. It appears he has just received his new Parliamentary pass, so he thought that it would be a great idea to tell the world what his password is:

"I put in my own birthday. Which I'm pretty sure I got right. ;-)"

Isn't it common sense not to write a lengthy post on the inner security workings of Parliament? I despair. As one of the commenters says:

"sweet Jesus you are a cretin sometimes...
"

Well, quite.

Cory

Posted by The golden strawberry at 17:06:17 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Of sound judgement?

Via Norm, this brightened up my day:

"The Conservatives today lost a High Court battle over a multimillion pound bequest from a mentally deluded man who believed that only Margaret Thatcher could save him from an international satanic conspiracy.

Branislav Kostic, a Belgrade-born businessman, changed his will in the late 1980s to give his entire fortune to the Tory Party after deciding that his relatives were part of a plot to kill him, and that his solicitors and accountants were part of a conspiracy to destroy the world...

[P]assing judgment at the High Court today, a judge ruled in favour of Mr Kostic's only son, Zoran, that his father - who died in 2005 - was suffering from a serious and untreated mental illness and would not have given the money to the Tories if he was of sane mind."

Well, who would?

Cory

Posted by The golden strawberry at 15:13:40 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Country bumkins

I'm guessing not many of you got the Observer today with it's guide to popular music. My favourite bit concerns "The 10 greatest country song titles of all time".

Loretta Lynn's "You're the reason our kids are ugly" and "She broke my heart, so I broke her jaw" by Rick Stanley deserve honourable mentions. However, the best title has to be the immortal "I don't know whether to kill myself or go bowling" by Thom Sharpe. Complete with the priceless couplet:

"These are my options/ It's that or watch TV".

Sadly I don't have much country music in my collection, so can't better these titles. Anyone got any better ideas?

Cory
Posted by The golden strawberry at 15:05:38 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

In Damascus, An Iraqi's plight highlights that of his people

We sat opposite each other, Zain and I, wreathed in a cloud of blue smoke produced by his cheap, unfiltered Syrian cigarettes. He offered me one, but I declined, preferring the less acrid smoke of the shish. We sipped small cups of strong, bitter Arabic coffee; Zain already polishing off his second. Cigarettes and coffee: the real fuel of life in the Middle East . We were well stocked with both and therefore ready to talk about Zain’s homeland: Iraq .

 

We were in Damascus, the capital of the Syrian Arab Republic , in one of the dozens of coffee houses that line its streets and alleyways. I had met him at the Immigration Ministry, which I had been forced to visit to renew my Visa. The Ministry building was in the centre of the city, just off

Martyrs Square
, and it was packed. Crowds of people were milling around on the street in front of it, smoking cigarettes and snapping irritably at each other in Arabic. From what I could tell, by glancing at their green-and-gold passports and listening to the dissimilar sound of their dialect to the local Syrians, the vast majority of them were Iraqi.

 

President Bashar Al-Assad glowered down at all of us from numerous portraits on the walls with his beady, close set eyes, watching whilst we navigated the turgid bureaucratic sea of his Ministry. Harassed looking immigration officers chain smoked whilst making decisions which would decide the future of hundreds of Iraqis like Zain. Would they be able to stay and find work? Or would they have to return to their homeland? That seemingly benighted country which, since the American invasion of 2003, has become an infernal cauldron, one of the most dangerous countries on the planet?

 

The Arabs are a friendly people, and an obviously confused Western tourist gave them an ideal opportunity to demonstrate their cultural knack for excellent hospitality. Zain, seeing that I was less than confident with the Arabic Visa form, rescued me from that bureaucratic black hole and served as my guide through the whole tedious procedure. Our passports stamped, we emerged from the Ministry. Nothing bonds travelers more tightly than common suffering at the hands of irritable immigration officials, and our new comradeship would be sealed by a trip to the coffee-house.

 

Zain was an old man, his face weather-beaten and his eyes dulled by years of stoical toil for limited reward. He spoke softly, but his laugh, frequently heard, was warm and unforced. When talking politics we shared more than one joke at the expense of our leaders; that Zain was able to laugh about the politics of his country was astonishing, as I was to find out.

 

His personal experience mirrored that of his country: war, dictatorship and Diaspora. He had fought in three Iraqi conflicts: the 1967 war against Israel ; the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war (the longest conventional war of the 20th century); and the genocidal al-Anfal campaign against the Kurds in the late 1980’s. He told me of hiding from Israeli bombers and artillery in the hills of Jordan , furtively smoking at night with his buddies, fearful of Israeli spotters which would glimpse their match flames and turn their foxhole into ash. He told me of trench warfare against waves of Iranian jihadis, young men used by the mullahs to clear Iraqi minefields. He didn’t talk about the Kurdistan campaign, and I didn’t press him for details (according to Human Rights Watch, at least 50,000 people were murdered by the Iraqi armed forces in Iraqi Kurdistan from 1987-89).

 

When not soldiering, Zain worked at sea. He had found work on an Italian merchant ship which sailed from Genoa, and had frequented ports in Africa and the Near East . Tripoli and Algiers, Cairo and Port Sudan became pit stops for his voyages on ancient maritime trade routes.

 

On returning to Iraq , Zain was arrested by the Iraqi secret police. A decade away had thrown his loyalty to the regime in doubt. The Mukharabat were determined to reassert it. He still had scars on his earlobes and lips from their electrodes. A year after his detention, he was released – just one more innocent victim of Saddam’s terror state.

 

He was living in Baghdad when the Americans came and, initially, he sullenly welcomed liberation at the hands of a foreign power. His patience was quickly ended, however, when the Americans cut off his pension. As a retired soldier, he was almost completely dependent on the State for his livelihood. Under their head-in-the-sand doctrine of rapid privatization the Americans destroyed the state pensions system; ‘shock therapy’ had left Zain destitute.

 

On top of this, Iraq was consumed with inter-communal violence, the Occupiers either unwilling or unable to do anything to stop it. Neighborhoods that were formerly mixed Sunni and Shia became sectarian fortresses as the more numerous group flexed its bloodthirsty muscle.

 

Desperate for work and afraid for his life, he had fled to Syria in late 2005, along with 1.3 million of his countrymen. To its credit, the Syrian government has done its best to accommodate these people, but resources are stretched thin. Wages have fallen and inflation has rocketed due to this massive influx of new workers, many of whom are well educated, and a threat to Syrian jobs. Tension between the new arrivals and the locals has escalated- the Syrians are petrified that the violence across the border will spread into their cities.

 

Zain has been reduced to waiting tables and petitioning the UN offices in Damascus for aid; a cruel fate for a man who once lived the romantic life of the sailor. Inshallah, he would manage to find a steady job. Otherwise he would have to take his chances back in Baghdad .

 

Exiled Iraqis were almost one million worldwide before the invasion, a number which has quadrupled in the years since then. Until the mayhem ends and they can return, these people are in limbo. They join the Palestinians and Kurds as people displaced by violence, without a home.

 

After a final cup of coffee we shook hands and parted ways. Zain was headed to the pharmacy for painkillers to help him ignore his stomach ulcers. Subsisting on coffee and cigarettes does little for your health, as does the uncertainty of enforced exile.

-posted by Adam

Posted by The golden strawberry at 20:26:45 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |